An Economic Hangover

How 44 days of Gridlock Shook United States Politics

By: Joseph Godshall

Nov. 17, 2025

The 44-day shutdown of the United States Government is officially at an end, but a return to work brings with it possible impacts on an already sluggish economy. After nearly a month and a half, the longest shutdown of the United States federal government ended on Wednesday evening after 47th President Donald J. Trump signed a continuing order on Wednesday evening, reopening federal agencies and sending employees back to work. While a resumption of federal activities brings economic recovery for many affected parties, including backpay for displaced and furloughed workers, what happens on a larger scale when the Capitol lights flicker back on? The prolonged shutdown will create an economic hangover: delayed data releases, stalled federal contracts, regulatory backlogs, shaken consumer confidence, and a political climate that increasingly feels like a risk factor all on its own.  

The shutdown stemmed from a legislative stalemate after Congress failed to pass necessary appropriations to fund federal agencies. This led to a deadlock in the House and Senate after the House Republicans attempted to pass a temporary funding bill, which was opposed by House Democrats, resulting in furloughed federal workers, a pause in government contracts and services, and delayed distribution of economic data. 

Most publicized, however, were the effects on airports nationwide. With long lines, a lack of workers, and canceled flights right before the holiday season, many American citizens felt a direct impact of the shutdown in their itineraries. Now that the government shutdown is officially at an end, the questions arise: What was missed, what changed, and how will markets recover going forward? 

While shutdowns within the government are not a new occurrence or tied to certain administrations, typically, shutdown leaves a negligible effect on the economy and often go unnoticed by the public eye. This round was different, as it is estimated that the shutdown shaved off anywhere between $7-14 billion from the U.S. GDP, a meaningful impact on an already fluctuating economy. 

During the shutdown, agencies in key economic roles stopped releasing crucial data used to stimulate the domestic market. The US Department of Labor, along with the Bureau of Economic Analysis, frequently produces reports and data that are used as indicators by investors to decrease market volatility and accurately respond to inflation and consumer spending data. As uncertainty rose during the shutdown, stocks fell, and investors shifted into safe assets. Furthermore, sectors heavily dependent on government spending, such as defense, aerospace, and healthcare sectors withheld investment and froze capital projects.

This shutdown not only challenges the American economy, but it sets a precedent that politics, law, and policy can be a direct influence on business and investment horizons. After the previous federal shutdown in 2019, Congress passed the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act, guaranteeing retroactive pay for furloughed federal employees, a requirement that has the potential to total tens of billions in delayed compensation. Analysts estimate that as many as $21 billion in federal paychecks were disrupted during this shutdown, which demonstrates how similar legislation will likely become more prominent within the future political landscape. 

When the continuing resolution expires on January 30th, investors and stakeholders should once again price the risk of another large-scale shutdown. While this risk raises market volatility, it also establishes an opportunity zone within markets. By paying attention to major regulatory shifts and budget fights on Capitol Hill, investors and companies with low dependency on federal operations can take advantage of the high levels of uncertainty to capitalize on the period of inactivity. Going forward, the large-scale effect of this shutdown highlights the need for stronger legal and policy mechanisms to mitigate the effects of future shutdowns. Ultimately, the last 44 days provide a demonstration of how deeply integrated government activity is within the country’s business landscape and call attention to the need to be observant of political indicators within domestic markets.